Signal Scout

Subject Correlation & Movement Analysis

Executive Summary

Analysis of Signal Scout device attribution data has identified SUBJ-03 (P3) as a nationally mobile actor with confirmed presence at four locations across four states over a 22-day period. Vehicle TPMS signature T02 (2023 Ford F-150) provides high-confidence tracking continuity between events. Multiple subject co-locations suggest a coordinated network operating across the Pacific Northwest and Upper Midwest.

Movement Pattern — P3 (22-Day Window)

Event Correlation

Key Findings

1. 01P3 is the common thread across all four locations, spanning 1,900+ miles over 22 days. Vehicle T02 (2023 Ford F-150, attributed at 92%) provides persistent tracking continuity at all 4 sites.
2. 02P0 co-located with P3 at Portland ICE facility despite only 62% attribution confidence on a single BT device — indicates P0 is more operationally significant than device profile suggests.
3. 03Co-location of P1/P6 with P3 at Minneapolis, and P4 with P3 at Seattle, reveals a network spanning at least 5 subjects across the Pacific Northwest and Upper Midwest.
4. 04P3's device cluster shows consistent carry pattern (B03 + W03 + W02 + T02) but notably absent IMSI/cell signature — possible deliberate countermeasure against cellular intercept.
5. 05Network topology is consistent with a compartmented cell structure. P3 is the only subject with confirmed ties to both groupings, suggesting a coordinator or liaison role. No direct P0–P4 contact has been observed, which may indicate deliberate operational separation.

Network Analysis — Probable Cell Structure

Co-location frequency, device proximity duration, and coordinated movement patterns indicate two overlapping operational groupings linked by P3 as a bridge node.

Assessment

P3 is assessed with MODERATE CONFIDENCE as a mobile coordinator bridging two distinct operational groupings across the Pacific Northwest and Upper Midwest. The consistent device carry pattern, combined with absence of cellular/IMSI attribution, suggests a subject with awareness of digital surveillance capabilities. P3's role as the sole link between Cell Alpha (P1, P6) and Cell Bravo (P0, P4) is consistent with a compartmented organizational structure designed to limit exposure — a hallmark of distributed activist networks.

Cell Alpha (P1, P3, P6) is assessed as the more cohesive grouping. The Minneapolis co-location demonstrated coordinated behavior patterns including synchronized arrival timing and shared proximity duration exceeding 4 hours. Cell Bravo remains provisional — P0 and P4 have no confirmed direct contact, and their association is inferred solely through P3 as an intermediary.

P0 remains the most significant intelligence gap. Single-device attribution at 62% confidence is insufficient for positive identification, yet co-location with P3 at a sensitive government facility warrants elevated collection priority. Establishing whether P0 has independent contact with P4 would significantly strengthen the Cell Bravo designation.

Recommended Actions

• Elevate P3 to Priority Collection Target — expand TPMS corridor monitoring on I-5, I-90, I-94
• Cross-reference P0 device signature (B01) against Portland-area field intelligence
• Task additional collection assets at anticipated June protest/event sites in both Cell Alpha (Upper Midwest) and Cell Bravo (Pacific NW) areas of operation
• Request interstate TPMS corridor analysis for T02 across Pacific NW highway network
• Priority: Determine whether P0 and P4 have independent contact — this would confirm Cell Bravo as an established grouping rather than a provisional designation
• Coordinate with field offices in Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, and Denver for ground truth validation of cell membership